Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under Rule 13(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was sustainable in a case where excess Cenvat credit had been taken and later reversed with payment of interest after the audit objection.
Analysis: The credit was found to have been taken in excess of the admissible amount under Rule 3(6)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, but the appellant reversed the amount promptly when pointed out by the audit and also paid interest. On these facts, the conduct was treated as reflecting bona fide mistake rather than fraudulent availment, and the payment of interest further indicated compliance. In these circumstances, separate penal action was considered unwarranted.
Conclusion: The penalty under Rule 13(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was set aside in favour of the appellant.