Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Small Scale Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. for the relevant subsequent financial year despite not being registered as a small scale unit during that period, where the exemption had already been availed in the preceding financial year.
Analysis: Para 4 of Notification No. 175/86-C.E. made the exemption applicable to a factory registered as a small scale industry, but also carved out an exception for a manufacturer who had been availing the exemption in the preceding financial year. The assessee had admittedly availed the notification in the financial year 1989-90, and the tribunal relied on the notification text as well as its earlier view that once the benefit had been validly availed in the preceding year, denial of the benefit in the succeeding year was not warranted merely for want of fresh registration during that period.
Conclusion: The denial of the small scale exemption was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed, resulting in relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the exemption notification itself preserves the benefit for a manufacturer who had been availing it in the preceding financial year, the exemption cannot be denied in the succeeding year solely because fresh small scale registration was absent for that period.