Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could, in a refund claim, challenge the correctness of an appealable order fixing annual capacity of the stenter which had not been appealed against.
Analysis: The order determining annual capacity under Section 3A was an appealable adjudication order. The assessee accepted that order, paid duty accordingly, and did not pursue the statutory appeal. A refund proceeding could not be used to reopen the correctness of that subsisting order. The principle applied was that once an appealable adjudication order attains finality for want of appeal, its correctness cannot later be questioned indirectly through a refund claim.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable to the extent it sought to assail the unchallenged capacity-determination order, and the issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: An appealable adjudication order that is not challenged in accordance with the statute attains finality and cannot be collaterally attacked in a subsequent refund proceeding.