Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pension received by the assessee from the Malaysian Government was assessable as salary under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in view of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Malaysia.
Analysis: The pension was examined in the light of articles 18(3) and 18(5) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The pension was treated as a payment falling within the Governmental source contemplated by the treaty, and since it was liable to tax in Malaysia, the Contracting State, taxation in India would amount to double taxation. The Tribunal's view that the University of Malaysia functioned as a statutory authority within the meaning of the treaty was accepted.
Conclusion: The pension was not taxable in India as salary, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.