Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether samples drawn within the factory for mandatory testing under the applicable drug-control regime were liable to central excise duty, and whether the demand and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the character of samples removed only for compulsory testing before the goods could be marketed. The reasoning accepted that the testing was a statutory requirement, that part of the sample may be consumed in the testing process, and that goods do not attain marketability until the prescribed testing is completed. On that basis, the samples drawn for such mandatory testing, including those retained within the factory, were treated as not giving rise to a duty liability. The earlier Tribunal view in the assessee's own case was followed, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have rightly applied that approach.
Conclusion: The samples drawn for mandatory testing were not liable to duty, and the demand and penalty could not stand.
Ratio Decidendi: Samples drawn within the factory exclusively for mandatory statutory testing, and consumed or retained in the course of such testing before marketability is reached, are not liable to central excise duty.