2008 (7) TMI 646 - AT - Customs

Tribunal rules Cess on imported rubber unjustified under Customs Tariff Act

TTK-LIG LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI

The Tribunal held that the levy of Cess on imported Natural Rubber Latex was not justified under the Customs Tariff Act, setting aside the demand in favor ... Cess - Rubber cess - Natural rubber latex - whether Cess was leviable on “Natural Rubber Latex” imported by the appellants and cleared under Bill of Entry dt. 30-8-95 and recoverable in the form of countervailing duty? - Held that: - the demand on imported rubber under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act was illegal - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:1. Levy of Cess on imported Natural Rubber Latex2. Interpretation of the Rubber Act and Customs Tariff Act3. Judicial precedent and applicability of Tribunal's decisionsLevy of Cess on Imported Natural Rubber Latex:The case involved a dispute regarding the levy of Cess on 'Natural Rubber Latex' imported by the appellants. The department issued a show-cause notice for the recovery of Cess amount from the importer, which was confirmed by the original authority and sustained by the first appellate authority. The appellant contended that Cess was not applicable to imported rubber under the Rubber Act. The Tribunal considered the issue and relied on the Tribunal's Larger Bench decision in a similar case, where it was held that additional duty of customs was leviable on imported rubber to the extent equal to the duty of excise levied as Cess under the Rubber Act on rubber produced in India. The Tribunal examined relevant legal provisions and held that the demand on imported rubber under the Customs Tariff Act was illegal, thereby allowing the appeal of the assessee.Interpretation of the Rubber Act and Customs Tariff Act:The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947, and the Customs Tariff Act in light of the dispute over the levy of Cess on imported rubber. It considered the applicability of Cess under Section 12 of the Rubber Act and Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. The Tribunal referred to judicial precedents and highlighted the importance of aligning the interpretation of these Acts with relevant legal decisions, including those of the Apex Court. By examining the legislative intent behind these Acts and the implications of the Cess levy on imported rubber, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for Cess on imported rubber under the Customs Tariff Act was not justified, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order in favor of the assessee.Judicial Precedent and Applicability of Tribunal's Decisions:The Tribunal emphasized the significance of judicial precedent and the relevance of previous decisions in similar cases involving the levy of Cess on imported rubber. It cited specific cases, including the Tribunal's Larger Bench decision and the Apex Court's order, to support its interpretation of the legal provisions. By comparing and contrasting various decisions, the Tribunal established a consistent approach in determining the leviability of Cess on imported rubber under the applicable Acts. The Tribunal's reliance on judicial precedent and its alignment with higher court decisions played a crucial role in resolving the dispute and ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee based on legal principles and established interpretations.