Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellant wins case on duty exemption for HSD oil used in Forklift & power plant</h1> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case concerning the disallowance of benefits under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. for HSD oil ... Export Oriented Unit, 100% EOU Issues:1. Disallowance of benefit of Notification No. 1/95-C.E. for HSD oil used in Forklift and captive power generation plant by a 100% EOU.2. Interpretation of conditions under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. regarding approval for receiving fuel and consumables for captive power plants.3. Entitlement of 100% EOU to procure material handling equipment without payment of duty.Analysis:1. The appellant, a 100% EOU, appealed against the disallowance of the benefit of Notification No. 1/95-C.E. for HSD oil used in a Forklift and captive power generation plant. The Revenue contended that the appellant lacked approval to receive HSD oil for the forklift, thus making the notification benefit unavailable for the oil used in the forklift.2. The appellant argued that under the notification, they were entitled to receive material handling equipment like a forklift without duty payment. They highlighted that the requirement for approval from the Asstt. Commissioner or Dy. Commissioner was specific to fuel, lubricants, and consumables for captive power plants. Since the HSD oil was used in the forklift, considered a material handling equipment, they asserted that no additional permission was needed for receiving the oil under the notification.3. The Tribunal examined the notification exempting payment of duty for capital goods and raw materials procured by a 100% EOU. Referring to the specific item in the notification regarding fuel, lubricants, and consumables for captive power plants, it was clarified that approval from the Asstt. Commissioner or Dy. Commissioner was necessary only for those items. As the HSD oil was utilized in the forklift for material handling purposes, it was concluded that no separate approval was required for receiving the oil. Consequently, the impugned order disallowing the benefit of the notification was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
