Export deduction u/s80HHC: interest on deposits and delayed export proceeds excluded; reassessment notice u/s 148 upheld.

Where the return was only processed under s.143(1)(a) and no prior assessment under s.143(3) existed, issuance of notice u/s 148 was held procedurally valid; the challenge to reassessment failed. On deduction u/s 80HHC, interest earned on deposits was held not to be "profits derived from export" and therefore not includible in business profits for s.80HHC computation; the assessee's claim was rejected. For computing the denominator "total turnover" under s.80HHC, export proceeds not brought into India within the prescribed period and consequently not forming part of eligible profits could not be included in total turnover; the Department's contention failed. Both appeals were dismissed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether reassessment/reopening under section 147 and notice under section 148 is valid where earlier the return was processed under section 143(1)(a) but no order under section 143(3) was passed; (ii) Whether (a) interest of Rs.15,23,037 earned on deposits is to be treated as business income for the purposes of deduction under section 80HHC, and (b) whether export proceeds of Rs.11,10,377 not brought into India within six months must be excluded from the denominator of total turnover when computing deduction under section 80HHC.

Issue (i): Whether reassessment/reopening under section 147 and notice under section 148 is valid despite only an intimation under section 143(1)(a) having been issued earlier.

Analysis: The intimation under section 143(1)(a) operates as a notice of demand for recovery purposes and is not equivalent to an assessment order under section 143(3). Where the statutory ingredients for reopening under section 147 are satisfied, initiation of reassessment proceedings by issuing notice under section 148 is permissible even if no proceedings under section 143(3) were earlier taken.

Conclusion: The reopening and reassessment proceedings under section 147 and notice under section 148 are valid.

Issue (ii): (a) Whether interest earned on bank deposits is business income eligible for deduction under section 80HHC; (b) Whether export sale proceeds not brought into India within six months are to be excluded from the denominator of total turnover for computing deduction under section 80HHC.

Analysis: (a) Deduction under section 80HHC is permissible only on profit derived from export of specified goods; interest on bank deposits arising from surplus funds does not constitute profit of export business for this purpose. (b) Export sale proceeds that are not brought into India within the statutory time limit do not form part of the assessable profit from exports and therefore cannot be included in the numerator or, correspondingly, in the denominator of total turnover when computing proportionate deduction under section 80HHC.

Conclusion: (a) Interest of Rs.15,23,037 is not business income deductible under section 80HHC and is not allowable as such; (b) The sum of Rs.11,10,377 not brought into India within six months is not to be included in the denominator of total turnover for computing deduction under section 80HHC.

Final Conclusion: Reassessment proceedings are valid; interest on deposit income is not deductible under section 80HHC; unremitted export proceeds not brought into India within the statutory time are excluded from computation of turnover for deduction purposes, resulting in a mixed outcome where some contentions succeed and others fail.

Ratio Decidendi: An intimation under section 143(1)(a) is not an assessment order under section 143(3) and does not preclude reopening under section 147; income from bank deposits is not profit from export business for section 80HHC purposes, and export proceeds not remitted within the statutory period cannot be included in total turnover when computing section 80HHC deduction.

---