Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be sustained on the basis of provisional invoices and whether Rule 57G(11) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 operated as a clarificatory provision without retrospective difficulty.
Analysis: The inputs were not disputed to have been received, duty paid, and used in the manufacture of the final product. Rule 57G(11) was treated as clarificatory in nature, intended to address prior disputes and to accord with the scheme and spirit of the Modvat Credit Rules. On that basis, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the appellate order allowing credit.
Conclusion: The credit was rightly allowed and the challenge to its grant failed.