Tribunal sets aside interest demand under Central Excise Act pre-2001 duty, ruling in favor of appellants.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act for duty payable before 11-5-2001, as per the Act's provisions. The appellants successfully argued that since no penalty was imposed and the duty was prior to the amendment in 2001, interest should not be levied. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the interest demand was not legally justified, leading to the appeal being allowed on this ground.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge against the demand of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against Order-in-Original No. 12/2007 by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-III. The de novo order was issued following Final Order Nos. 553-554/2005, where the Central Excise Commissioner was required to calculate the Central Excise Duty liability on goods procured indigenously without Central Excise Duty and not used in goods for export. The High Court of Karnataka upheld the Tribunal's order, leading to the Commissioner demanding Central Excise Duty and interest under Section 11AB. The appellants challenged only the interest portion, not the duty quantification, as it had already been paid. The focus was on the demand of interest.

The appellant's representative referred to Section 11AB(2) of the Central Excise Act, highlighting that interest provisions did not apply if duty was payable or should have been paid before the Finance Bill of 2001 received the President's assent. The amendment in 2001 made interest payable for all demands, not just for cases of fraud or suppression of facts. In this case, since no penalty was imposed due to clear Tribunal findings, interest should not be levied for duty prior to 11-5-2001, when the amended Section 11AB came into effect. As the duty in question was before this date, the demand for interest was not legally justified. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the interest demand and allowing the appeal on this ground.

In conclusion, the Tribunal held that the demand for interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act was not valid for duty payable before 11-5-2001, as per the provisions of the Act. The appeal was allowed, and the interest demand was set aside based on the legal interpretation of the relevant law and amendments.

---