Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported zinc-EDTA chelate was, for the purpose of interim relief, classifiable as a micronutrient fertilizer under Heading 3105 rather than under Heading 2922, and whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The product was described as a separate chemically defined compound with a definite molecular structure, which could prima facie attract Chapter 29. However, the material on record, including the laboratory report and chemical literature, indicated that it was used as a micronutrient fertilizer and that nitrogen was present as an essential constituent. Note 6 to Chapter 31 applies Heading 3105 to products of a kind used as fertilizers containing, as an essential constituent, at least one fertilizing element such as nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium. On that basis, the appellants' classification claim under Heading 3105 was found to be prima facie sustainable. As the same classification basis governed the connected excise appeals, the product in bulk was also treated as remaining under Heading 3105 even after repacking and relabelling, for the limited purpose of interim relief.
Conclusion: The classification claim under Heading 3105 was accepted prima facie, and waiver of pre-deposit together with stay of recovery was granted in favour of the appellants.