1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal modifies penalty, upholds demands.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT upheld demands against the appellant but set aside the penalty imposed in the impugned order. The penalty was modified to ... Quantum of Penalty - Held that: - The contention in the remand proceeding, in absence of challenge to the penalty imposed by the first adjudication order, quantum of penalty cannot be enhanced - enhancement of penalty set aside. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld demands against the appellant based on a previous decision. The penalty imposed in the impugned order was set aside as the quantum of penalty cannot be enhanced without challenging the initial penalty. The penalty was modified to Rs. 15,000/- and Rs. 20,000/-.