Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount deposited by the respondent was in the nature of pre-deposit and whether interest on its refund was payable only after three months from the date of disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The respondent had deposited duty and penalty during the pendency of the appeal, and the amount was appropriated by the department. On that footing, the deposit was treated as a pre-deposit linked to the appellate proceedings. The applicable principle, as noticed from the Supreme Court decision and the Board circular, was that pre-deposits are to be returned within three months from the date of the appellate order, and interest becomes payable only after that period if refund is delayed. The Commissioner (Appeals) had granted interest from an earlier date, which was not correct on these facts.
Conclusion: The amount was a pre-deposit and interest was payable only after three months from the date of disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals).
Final Conclusion: The order granting interest was modified so that interest would run only after the stipulated three-month period from the appellate disposal date.