Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of jewellery by the assessee to the company constituted a gift within the meaning of the Gift-tax Act.
Analysis: The expression "gift" covers a transfer by one person to another of existing movable or immovable property made voluntarily and without consideration in money or money's worth. The definition of "transfer of property" is of wide amplitude and includes disposition, conveyance, assignment, settlement, delivery and other alienation of property, as well as transactions intended to diminish the transferor's property and increase the property of another. On the terms of the transfer letter, the assessee divested herself of all rights in the jewellery for a specified period, while the transferee obtained full ownership and enjoyment during that period. The fact that the transfer was revocable after 74 months did not alter the character of the transaction during the period of irrevocability, and the transfer remained one made without consideration.
Conclusion: The transfer amounted to a gift and was chargeable under the Gift-tax Act. The answer was therefore against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.