Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty was payable on clearance of old and used press felt, and whether such clearance could be treated as removal of capital goods as such.
Analysis: The clearance was shown by the sample invoices to be of old and used press felt and not scrap, though the record also indicated that worn-out felt ultimately became scrap and was disposed of from the scrap yard. The Tribunal noted that clearance of old and used press felt was not dutiable and relied on prior decisions holding that sale of used machinery or similar used goods does not amount to clearance of capital goods as such. It was further held that a Board circular cannot override the statutory position.
Conclusion: Duty was not payable on the clearance of old and used press felt, and the demand was unsustainable. The appeal was rejected, in favour of the assessee.