Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on imported goods liable to be re-exported required interference, and whether valuation of the goods needed to be examined in the circumstances.
Analysis: The goods were to be re-exported, the importers had no past offence, and their inability to clear the goods arose from non-availability of the required certificate from the Drugs Control Authorities. In that situation, the question of valuation was treated as unnecessary to examine, and a lenient approach was considered appropriate. The heavy fine and penalty were found unjustified in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The penalty was set aside and the redemption fine was reduced to a token amount of Rs. 25,000, with release and immediate re-export of the consignment.