Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after merger of two erstwhile units into a single legal entity, the clearances of both predecessor units in the preceding financial year had to be clubbed for determining eligibility to small-scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93 dated 28-2-1993.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 1/93 was available only where the aggregate clearances of the manufacturer did not exceed the prescribed limit in the preceding financial year. After the merger approved by the High Court, only one legal entity existed, though the merged undertaking continued to operate from two premises as Unit-A and Unit-B. The two premises could not be treated as separate legal entities or separate manufacturers after the merger. The clearances of both predecessor units therefore had to be treated as the clearances of the newly formed entity for the purpose of eligibility under the notification.
Conclusion: The clearances of the predecessor units were rightly clubbed, and the assessee was not entitled to claim separate small-scale exemption for Unit-B.