Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 214/86-C.E. dated 25-3-86 applied to clearances sent for job work and whether the appellants could be made liable to pay duty on the processed goods returned by the job workers for use in manufacturing fully exempted railway wagons.
Analysis: The exemption notification was held to apply only where the finished goods are leviable to duty, either wholly or partly. The finished product in this case was fully exempt from duty, so the notification had no application. The duty demand could not be fastened on the appellants in respect of goods processed by job workers, since the appellants had not manufactured those goods. Even if the processed goods were regarded as excisable, any demand had to be raised against the job workers, who were not before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: Notification No. 214/86-C.E. dated 25-3-86 was held inapplicable, and the appellants were not liable to pay duty on the impugned goods processed by the job workers.