Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remission of duty was admissible under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 in respect of handling loss claimed to be natural and unavoidable.
Analysis: The application for remission had been rejected on the view that handling loss was man-made and outside the scope of Rule 21. The Tribunal relied on its earlier view that the expression covering unavoidable accidents before removal is wide enough to include handling losses, particularly where the loss is insignificant and attributable to unavoidable loss during handling and storage.
Conclusion: Remission could not be denied on the ground that handling loss was per se outside Rule 21. The rejection order was unsustainable and was set aside.