Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2007 (12) TMI 329 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Modvat and Cenvat credit limits on diverted fuel inputs, captive gas use, interest, penalty, and process loss clarified on remand. Modvat/Cenvat credit on LSHS and additive fuel oil used to generate electricity and steam diverted outside the factory was treated as inadmissible for the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Modvat and Cenvat credit limits on diverted fuel inputs, captive gas use, interest, penalty, and process loss clarified on remand.

                            Modvat/Cenvat credit on LSHS and additive fuel oil used to generate electricity and steam diverted outside the factory was treated as inadmissible for the period before 1-3-1997, and remained confined under Rule 57B(iv) to electricity or steam used within the factory. Duty demand on hydrogen gas captively used for steam supplied to a sister unit was rejected. Interest was held unsustainable where the relevant provision was not properly invoked, while penalty required fresh consideration in light of the assessee's disclosures and the differing departmental norms. Demand arising from AC-to-DC conversion loss was treated as unsustainable as an inevitable process loss. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication and re-quantification where necessary.




                            Issues: (i) Whether Modvat/Cenvat credit on LSHS and additive fuel oil used for generation of electricity and steam diverted outside the factory was admissible; (ii) whether duty demand on hydrogen gas captively used in producing steam cleared to a sister unit was sustainable; (iii) whether interest and penalty could be sustained in the absence of proper invocation and on the facts of the case; and (iv) whether the demand on account of power loss in conversion from AC to DC power was sustainable.

                            Issue (i): Whether Modvat/Cenvat credit on LSHS and additive fuel oil used for generation of electricity and steam diverted outside the factory was admissible.

                            Analysis: Credit under Rule 57A(1) was available only where inputs were used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products cleared on payment of duty. The Tribunal held that the inputs used for generation of electricity or steam which were diverted outside the factory did not satisfy that requirement for the period prior to 1-3-1997. It further held that, after the introduction of Rule 57B(iv), credit remained confined to electricity or steam used within the factory of production, and the impugned demands on LSHS and additive fuel oil were supported by the statutory scheme.

                            Conclusion: Credit on LSHS and additive fuel oil relatable to electricity and steam diverted outside the factory was not admissible, and the demand on that count was upheld in principle.

                            Issue (ii): Whether duty demand on hydrogen gas captively used in producing steam cleared to a sister unit was sustainable.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal applied the principle that intermediate products removed to sister units manufacturing dutiable final products did not warrant a separate duty demand in the manner proposed. On that basis, the duty demand raised on hydrogen gas was found unsustainable.

                            Conclusion: The duty demand on hydrogen gas was rejected.

                            Issue (iii): Whether interest and penalty could be sustained in the absence of proper invocation and on the facts of the case.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal held that interest could not be sustained where the relevant statutory provision had not been properly invoked in the show cause notices. On penalty, it found deliberate withholding of information relevant to the inadmissible credit, but also noted that penalty was not justified for demands arising from differing norms adopted by the assessee and the department. It therefore left the matter to fresh adjudication along with re-quantification and reconsideration of the period-wise position.

                            Conclusion: Interest was not sustainable as framed, while penalty required reconsideration in fresh adjudication.

                            Issue (iv): Whether the demand on account of power loss in conversion from AC to DC power was sustainable.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal treated the conversion loss as an inevitable process loss and held that credit could not be denied merely on that basis.

                            Conclusion: The demand relating to AC to DC conversion loss was not sustainable.

                            Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed by way of remand, and the original authority was directed to re-adjudicate the cases afresh in light of the Tribunal's findings, including re-quantification where necessary.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found