Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty paid by debit in Cenvat credit account instead of account current could be regularised on subsequent payment through PLA, and whether penalty under Rule 25(a) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001 was warranted.
Analysis: The duty amount was subsequently paid from account current, and the earlier debit from the Cenvat account was directed to be treated as available for utilisation. On the penalty aspect, removal of excisable goods without payment from account current was treated as a contravention attracting Rule 25(a) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001. The earlier debarment from fortnightly payment facility did not by itself eliminate penalty liability, though the surrounding facts justified moderation of the penalty.
Conclusion: The duty payment was treated as made through PLA, the Cenvat debit was allowed to remain available for utilisation, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 25,000/-, in favour of the assessee to that extent.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with the monetary penalty substantially reduced while the duty payment position was upheld as regularised.
Ratio Decidendi: Removal of excisable goods in breach of the prescribed mode of duty payment attracts penalty, but the quantum may be reduced on the facts where the duty is subsequently paid through the proper account.