Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Spent Sulphuric Acid arising in the manufacture of Acid Slurry was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 89/95-C.E. dated 18-05-1995 or Notification No. 88/88-C.E. dated 01-03-1988.
Analysis: The claim under Notification No. 89/95-C.E. failed because the benefit was confined to scrap arising in the manufacture of specified goods and did not extend to waste and scrap arising in a factory where other than exempted goods were also manufactured. The claim under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. also failed because the Spent Acid was not accepted as goods consumed in the manufacture of detergent cake and detergent powder, and the clearance of the material from the factory showed that the condition of captive consumption within the manufacturer's factory or another eligible factory was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The exemption under both notifications was not available and the claim was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed as the disputed product did not satisfy the conditions of the claimed exemption notifications.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption based on captive consumption is unavailable where the material is cleared from the factory and the notification conditions are not strictly fulfilled, and waste or scrap benefits cannot be extended beyond the terms of the exemption notification.