TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether receipts from maintenance and support charges, consultancy charges, and CPC India/COSMIS-related receipts were eligible for deduction under section 80HHE. (ii) Whether the estimate of expenditure attributable to earning dividend income required fresh adjudication.
Issue (i): Whether receipts from maintenance and support charges, consultancy charges, and CPC India/COSMIS-related receipts were eligible for deduction under section 80HHE.
Analysis: The relevant test under section 80HHE is whether the receipts arise from export of computer software or from technical services connected with the development or production of computer software. The expression "computer software" is linked to a computer programme, i.e. a set of instructions capable of causing a computer to perform a task or achieve a result. Receipts incidental to activities involving writing of computer software can qualify, but the record did not clearly establish the precise nature of the services rendered in relation to each receipt. The earlier authorities had applied a restrictive distinction between released and unreleased software versions and had treated some receipts as ineligible on that basis. The Tribunal held that such a criterion was not consistent with the statutory scheme and that the date of release of software was not material if the income had accrued in accordance with the accounting system and the services were in connection with software development or production. It also noted that actual use of the exported software in India would not by itself disentitle the assessee if the software was exported or technical services were provided outside India.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, and the assessee was entitled to deduction if the receipts were shown to be connected with writing of computer software or technical services abroad.
Issue (ii): Whether the estimate of expenditure attributable to earning dividend income required fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The estimate had been made on an ad hoc basis by the Assessing Officer and reduced by the first appellate authority. Both sides relied on the Special Bench decision for the appropriate basis of determination. In view of that position, the issue required reconsideration by the Assessing Officer after granting an opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in accordance with the Special Bench decision.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only for statistical purposes, with both substantive grounds sent back for fresh adjudication rather than finally decided on quantum relief.
Ratio Decidendi: For deduction under section 80HHE, the decisive inquiry is whether the receipt is derived from export of computer software or technical services connected with its development or production, i.e. activities involving writing of computer programme, and not whether the software was newly released or whether its later use occurred in India.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
