Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the case of an assessee following the completed contract method, expenditure disallowable for non-payment of tax deducted at source was to be added to total income or adjusted against work-in-progress, and whether disallowance could be sustained in respect of completed projects.
Analysis: Under the completed contract method, project-related expenditure is accumulated in work-in-progress and the profit is determined only on completion of the contract. Expenditure which is otherwise not allowable under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not justify an addition to total income in the year of incurrence in respect of incomplete projects; the correct course is to rectify the work-in-progress so that the disallowance is reflected in the year of completion. The Assessing Officer is entitled to examine and correct the work-in-progress account, but the disallowance cannot be mechanically added to income where the project remains incomplete. In respect of completed projects, the disallowance survives subject to verification of the computation.
Conclusion: The addition made in total income for incomplete projects was unsustainable and had to be deleted, while the disallowance relating to completed project work was left to be verified and maintained as appropriate.