Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under Notification No. 63/95-C.E. dated 16-3-1995 was available to the appellant for goods supplied through M/s. BEML to the Ministry of Defence.
Analysis: The Board's circulars clarified that the exemption was intended not only for job workers but also for vendors and ancillary units supplying inputs required by M/s. BEML for manufacture of finished goods supplied to the Ministry of Defence. The goods cleared by the appellant were admittedly supplied to M/s. BEML and then supplied onward for the intended defence use. As departmental circulars are binding on the revenue, the exemption could not be denied on the narrow ground that the appellant was not a job worker.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification, and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.