1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules on Cenvat credit eligibility for quality control and R&D inputs</h1> The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on inputs used for quality control but ... Cenvat/Modvat - Issues involved: Determination of eligibility for Cenvat credit on inputs used in Research and Development and Quality Control.Details of the judgment:1. The Commissioner (Appeals) partly allowed the assessee's appeal by denying Cenvat credit on inputs used in Research and Development and Quality Control, while allowing credit on inputs used in the effluent treatment plant. 2. The appellant argued that they are eligible for Modvat credit for inputs used in Quality Control, citing a Tribunal judgment and an Apex Court judgment supporting their claim.3. The learned DR contended that Research and Development and Quality Control are not part of the manufacturing process, hence the inputs used in these activities should not be considered for Cenvat credit.4. The Tribunal observed that inputs used for quality testing and testing of raw material for quality control are integral to the manufacturing process of finished goods, based on a cited judgment. Therefore, denial of Modvat credit for inputs used in quality control was deemed incorrect.5. However, the Tribunal upheld the denial of credit on inputs used in Research and Development, as it was determined not to be a part of the manufacturing process. Consequently, the denial of credit amounting to Rs. 84,413 was upheld.6. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on inputs used for quality control, but upholding the denial of credit for inputs used in Research and Development.7. The judgment was pronounced and dictated in open court by Dr. S.L. Peeran, J.