Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the valuation of PCB sub-assemblies for central excise purposes had to be determined in accordance with the Board circular directing adoption of CAS-4 and whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The assessment of the sub-assemblies was found to have been made without applying the February 2003 circular requiring cost of production to be worked out in accordance with CAS-4. The earlier remand direction had also required reconsideration on that basis, yet the adjudicating authority treated CAS-4 as a new plea and did not apply it. The reasoning further noted that the Supreme Court decision in Cadbury India Ltd., dealing with exclusion of certain expenses from the assessable value of captively consumed intermediate products, had emerged after the impugned order and reinforced the need for fresh determination. In these circumstances, the valuation could not be sustained on the basis adopted in the impugned order.
Conclusion: The valuation issue was answered in favour of the assessee to the extent that the order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with the circular and the later Supreme Court ruling.