Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the question of set-off of loss can arise only in the assessment of the succeeding year or years when positive income is available; (ii) whether the Tribunal was right in vacating the direction that the loss shall not be carried forward.
Issue (i): Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the question of set-off of loss can arise only in the assessment of the succeeding year or years when positive income is available.
Analysis: The earlier Tribunal order on which reliance was placed had already been reversed by the Court in another matter concerning a partner of the same firm. Once that was removed, the reasoning sustaining the Tribunal's view could not stand. The Court also noted that the assessee had not filed the return within the time prescribed under section 139(1) or section 139(3) of the Income-tax Act, and therefore the statutory condition for carrying forward the loss was not satisfied under section 80 of the Act.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the Tribunal was right in vacating the direction that the loss shall not be carried forward.
Analysis: Since the return was not filed within the prescribed time, the assessee was not entitled to carry forward the loss. The contention that the question of carry forward could be decided only in the succeeding year when set-off was claimed was rejected.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by holding that the assessee was not entitled to carry forward the loss, and the Tribunal's view was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A loss cannot be carried forward unless the return is filed within the statutory time limit, and the legality of carry forward need not await the year in which set-off is claimed.