TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether cash seized during search could be adjusted against the assessee's advance tax liability for the relevant assessment year under section 132B(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) Whether interest under section 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where the return was filed within the extended due date.
Issue (i): Whether cash seized during search could be adjusted against the assessee's advance tax liability for the relevant assessment year under section 132B(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 132B(1)(i) permits seized assets to be applied towards existing liabilities under the Act. Advance tax is part of the statutory scheme of tax collection under sections 208 to 211 and, where the liability has arisen, it answers the description of an existing liability. A restrictive construction excluding advance tax would defeat the purpose of the provision. The seized cash had remained with the Department, the assessee had made repeated written requests for adjustment, and there was no justified basis to deny appropriation against the advance tax liability.
Conclusion: The seized cash was liable to be adjusted against the assessee's advance tax liability, and the denial of such adjustment was incorrect.
Issue (ii): Whether interest under section 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where the return was filed within the extended due date.
Analysis: The return was filed within the time extended by the CBDT notification. In such circumstances, the filing cannot be treated as delayed for the purpose of section 234A, and no interest could be charged under that provision.
Conclusion: Interest under section 234A was not leviable and had to be deleted.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the principal tax adjustment issue and on the levy of interest for delayed filing, resulting in acceptance of the appeal and recomputation of consequential interest under sections 234B and 234C after giving effect to the seized cash adjustment.
Ratio Decidendi: Seized cash may be adjusted against advance tax liability when that liability has arisen and falls within the expression "existing liability" in section 132B(1)(i), and no interest under section 234A is chargeable where the return is filed within the extended statutory due date.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
