Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty on petroleum products cleared from bonded storage tanks was to be determined on the basis of consignment-wise invoices or on the basis of periodic out-turn reports.
Analysis: From 1-4-1994, invoices became the statutory duty-paying document and also the document relevant for credit entitlement. Out-turn reports were periodic warehouse-level statements, not consignment-specific documents, and could not displace the invoices prepared for each clearance. The changes in the law made the invoice the relevant basis for determining duty liability, while the out-turn statement was only a control mechanism for warehouse accounting and loss monitoring. The prior view treating out-turn as the basis was found distinguishable and not applicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The out-turn report could not be treated as the basis for demanding duty; duty was to be assessed on the invoiced quantity and value, in favour of Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The order of the lower appellate authority was set aside and the department's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: After invoices became the statutory duty-paying document, a non-consignment-specific out-turn statement could not govern duty determination where clearances were made through consignment-wise invoices.