Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of duty and penalty was liable to be waived on the basis that the gases escaped into the atmosphere due to technological necessity and the Board circular covered the case in favour of the assessee.
Analysis: The appellant manufactured gases and a part of the gases was vented into the atmosphere because of the technological process. A Board circular specifically stated that no duty was required to be discharged where gas escaped into the atmosphere through flare system or otherwise. The circular was treated as binding on the authorities, and the contrary reasoning adopted by the department was held not applicable to the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The demand was held to be covered by the circular in favour of the assessee, and the requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted and recovery was stayed, with the appeal directed to proceed to final hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: A binding departmental circular governing the factual situation must be followed, and where it shows that no duty is payable on gas escaping in the course of the process, pre-deposit of the disputed duty and penalty can be waived.