Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether wrist watch straps manufactured by the appellants were entitled to exemption as watch components under Notification No. 72/86-C.E.
Analysis: The notification benefit had already been recognised in earlier decisions holding that a watch strap is an integral and essential part of a wrist watch. The contrary view in an earlier line of decisions was not preferred because it had been rendered without the benefit of the Apex Court ruling on the character of a watch strap. The Tribunal also noted that the list of components in the customs notification was only indicative and not exhaustive, and that the central excise notification did not restrict the exemption by naming components exclusively.
Conclusion: Wrist watch straps were held to be essential components of a wrist watch and entitled to the exemption.