Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a company in liquidation remains assessable to wealth-tax during the subsistence of the winding-up proceedings, and whether the assessing authority was required to verify from the books that assets exceeded liabilities before making the assessment.
Analysis: A company subjected to a winding-up order does not cease to exist as a legal entity until it is dissolved. Under the Wealth-tax Act, the definition of company and the charging provision did not exclude a company under winding up. The making of a winding-up order only sets in motion the process leading to dissolution and does not divest the company of ownership of its assets. Such a company may still have surplus assets after meeting liabilities, and the absence of a provision comparable to section 178 of the Income-tax Act did not affect the charge to wealth-tax. Since the assessing authority had already accepted and allowed the liabilities disclosed with the return, no further verification of the books was necessary for the assessment on net wealth.
Conclusion: A company in liquidation remained liable to assessment to wealth-tax for the relevant assessment years, and the assessing authority had jurisdiction to make the assessment on the net wealth without first proving from the books that assets exceeded liabilities.
Ratio Decidendi: A company under a winding-up order continues as a legal person until dissolution, and in the absence of an express statutory exclusion, its net wealth remains chargeable to wealth-tax.