Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 18(3) of the Customs Act could be levied on duty arising from finalisation of a provisional assessment made before the provision came into force.
Analysis: The item imported required provisional assessment because its composition could be ascertained only by chemical analysis. The provisional assessments were made before 13-7-2006, while finalisation and payment of differential duty occurred later. Section 18(3) of the Customs Act and rule 7(4) of the Central Excise (No. 2) Rules, 2001 were treated as pari materia provisions, and the Board's clarification under the corresponding Central Excise provision was taken as governing guidance. On that basis, the provision for interest was viewed as inapplicable where the provisional assessment itself preceded the commencement date of section 18(3). Section 28AB was considered only as a rate-fixing reference and not as enlarging the substantive liability.
Conclusion: Interest was held to be prima facie not leviable on provisional assessments made before 13-7-2006, and the appellants were granted waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery.