Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether provisional release of the confiscated imported goods pending final disposal of the appeal should be permitted, and on what conditions, in view of the disputed WPC licence, the alleged breach of import conditions, and the departmental demand for duty, fine, and penalty.
Analysis: The goods had been confiscated on the basis of alleged misdeclaration, absence of the required WPC licence, and breach of the conditions attached to the customs exemption notification. The later-produced WPC and import licences were noted, and the Court found that their validity and applicability required examination by the Commissioner. As regards the goods covered by the remaining bills of entry, the Court accepted that the installation-certificate condition under the exemption notification raised a arguable point that required further consideration at the final hearing. Since the appeal was pending and the goods were capital equipment relevant to discharge of export obligation, the Court considered provisional release appropriate, provided Revenue interests were protected by suitable monetary conditions.
Conclusion: Provisional release of the confiscated goods was directed, subject to payment of the duty and deposit of amounts toward redemption fine and penalty, and subject further to the Commissioner being satisfied about compliance with the WPC licence requirement.