Transaction value under Customs valuation rules must be accepted absent Rule 4(2) exceptions; fine and penalty reduced.

Declared transaction value of imported second-hand goods can be rejected only if the case falls within the exceptions in Rule 4(2) of the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988. Factors such as the importer being a trader, the goods being used, lack of supporting evidence, and a Chartered Engineer's appraisal did not establish any such exception. In the absence of valid grounds to discard the transaction value, the declared value had to be accepted for assessment. As the enhanced valuation could not stand, the redemption fine and penalty based on it were reduced.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of the imported second-hand goods could be rejected in the absence of any circumstance falling within Rule 4(2) of the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988, and whether the consequential redemption fine and penalty required reduction.

Analysis: The declared value of imported goods can be rejected only when the case falls within the exceptions contemplated by Rule 4(2) of the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988. The reasons relied upon for enhancement of value, including the fact that the importer was a trader, the goods were used goods, the absence of supporting evidence, and the Chartered Engineer's appraisal, did not establish any exception under the proviso to Rule 4(2). In the absence of valid grounds for rejection of transaction value, the declared value had to be accepted for assessment. Since the valuation order did not survive, the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the basis of the enhanced value also required modification.

Conclusion: The rejection of the declared transaction value was unsustainable. The declared value was directed to be accepted, and the redemption fine and penalty were reduced.

---