Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cess could be levied on imported coke treated as coal, and whether the Ministry of Coal's clarification excluded the final product of a coke plant from the cess net.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of imported coke and the effect of the Ministry of Coal's clarification. The clarification indicated that excise duty and cess were leviable on raw coal dispatched from mines or used in coke making, and not on the final product of the coke plant. The authorities below had not examined that clarification. On the material before it, the Tribunal found that imported coke was the final product of the coke plant and not coal.
Conclusion: Cess was not leviable on imported coke, and the confirmation of cess was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the levy of cess on the imported coke was annulled on the basis that it was a final product and not coal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a product is established to be the final output of a coke plant and the applicable clarification limits cess to raw coal, cess cannot be sustained on that final product.