Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit was admissible on inputs used in the manufacture of intermediate products such as PCBs and transformers, which were in turn used in the manufacture of final products, and whether the assessee's payment of 8% on exempt clearances affected the entitlement to credit.
Analysis: The definition of input was construed broadly to include goods used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, whether directly or indirectly. Inputs used for intermediate products that were essential in the manufacture of the final products were held to fall within the credit scheme. The reasoning treated indirect participation in manufacture as sufficient for eligibility. It was also noted that, where separate inventories or accounts were not maintained for common inputs used in dutiable and exempted products, the assessee had already discharged the amount equivalent to 8% of the price of exempted goods, as required by the relevant regime.
Conclusion: Credit on the inputs was admissible and the assessee was not required to reverse the benefit on the facts found. The departmental appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Inputs used in an essential intermediate stage of manufacture remain eligible for credit when they are used in relation to the manufacture of the final product, even if the intermediate product is exempt, and the prescribed amount on exempt clearances has been paid.