Tribunal Rules Service Tax Must Be Included in Gross Revenue for Income Calculations u/s 44BB.

The tribunal upheld the inclusion of service tax in gross revenue for computing income under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a Netherlands-based company, argued that service tax should be excluded as it is collected on behalf of the government. However, the tribunal concluded that service tax forms part of the receipts for services related to mineral oil exploration/extraction and should be included in the total receipts. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the CIT (Appeals) decision and restored the AO's order, allowing the revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Inclusion of service tax in gross revenue for computing income under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Inclusion of service tax in gross revenue for computing income under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The revenue appealed against the CIT (Appeals) order allowing a relief of Rs. 2,96,018 by excluding service tax from gross revenue for computing income under section 44BB. The assessee, a Netherlands-based company, claimed that service tax should not be part of gross receipts as it is collected on behalf of the government. The Assessing Officer (AO) included service tax in the total receipts, determining the income under section 44BB at 10% of the total receipts, including service tax.

During the assessment, the AO observed that the assessee offered income under section 44BB at 10% of receipts, which included service tax. The AO argued that service tax forms part of contractual receipts for services related to mineral oil exploration/extraction, thus should be included in total receipts. Consequently, the AO computed the income by adding Rs. 29,60,180 (service tax) to the gross contractual revenues, resulting in a total income of Rs. 65,26,490.

The CIT (Appeals) disagreed, excluding service tax from total receipts, reasoning that service tax collections are on behalf of the government, representing reimbursement without profit. The CIT (Appeals) directed the AO to compute income excluding service tax receipts.

The revenue, represented by the learned DR, contended that service tax should be included in total receipts for section 44BB computation, citing Uttarakhand High Court decisions in CIT v. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc., Sedco Forex International Inc., and CIT v. Trans Ocean Offshore Inc. The assessee, represented by the learned AR, argued that service tax collected on behalf of the government should not be included in total receipts, referencing ITAT decisions in Asstt. CIT v. Real Image Media Technologies (P.) Ltd. and Transocean Offshore Deep Water Drilling Inc. v. Asstt. CIT.

The tribunal examined section 44BB, which deems 10% of specified amounts as profits for non-resident assessees providing services related to mineral oil exploration/extraction. The tribunal noted that section 44BB includes amounts paid/payable for services and facilities in connection with mineral oil activities, whether received in or out of India. The tribunal considered Uttarakhand High Court rulings, emphasizing that section 44BB is a complete code in itself, focusing on amounts received for services, not actual taxable income under sections 4 and 5.

The tribunal found that service tax collected by the assessee was part of receipts for services provided to ONGC, falling under section 44BB. The tribunal distinguished the ITAT Chennai decision in Real Image Media Technologies (P.) Ltd., which dealt with section 43B, not section 44BB. The tribunal also distinguished the ITAT Delhi decision in Transocean Offshore Deep Water Drilling Inc., which involved customs duty, not service tax directly related to services under section 44BB.

Concluding that service tax collected for services specified in section 44BB should be included in total receipts for computing presumptive profit, the tribunal set aside the CIT (Appeals) order and restored the AO's order, including service tax in the total receipts for section 44BB computation.

Conclusion: The appeal filed by the revenue was allowed, and the inclusion of service tax in gross revenue for computing income under section 44BB was upheld.

---