Natural justice in SSI exemption disputes requires independent scrutiny of classification and party participation in verification.

An appellate order sustaining demand, interest and penalties was found unsustainable where the Commissioner (Appeals) relied on verification conducted behind the appellant's back and did not independently address the objection that generic medicines had been wrongly included in the assessable clearances. The disposal also failed to examine whether the goods were generic or patent/proprietary medicaments, including the relevant tariff note. This approach was held to breach natural justice and reflect non-application of mind. The matter was therefore set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate order sustaining demand, interest and penalties could be upheld when the Commissioner (Appeals) relied on verification carried out behind the appellant's back and failed to independently deal with the plea that generic medicines were wrongly included in the assessable clearances.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the method adopted for working out the clearances for SSI exemption and the treatment of generic medicines vis-a -vis patent or proprietary medicaments. The appellate authority did not independently examine the appellant's specific objections and instead referred the matter for verification by the Assistant Commissioner without giving the appellant an opportunity to participate in, or meet, that verification. The order also did not show any proper examination of whether the product in question was generic or patent/proprietary, nor did it address the relevant tariff note governing that classification. This manner of disposal was held to offend natural justice and to show non-application of mind.

Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained and the matter was required to be reconsidered afresh after hearing both sides.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded by way of remand, with the earlier appellate order set aside for fresh decision according to law.

Ratio Decidendi: An appellate order based on material verified behind a party's back, without giving that party an opportunity to respond, and without independent consideration of the decisive factual and classification issues, is vitiated by breach of natural justice and non-application of mind and must be set aside for fresh adjudication.

---