CENVAT credit reversal before notice defeats interest and penalty where suppression or fraud is not established

CENVAT credit reversed before the show cause notice, with interest also paid, so interest under Section 11AB and penalty under Rule 13 were not sustainable. The Tribunal noted that the authorities recorded no finding of suppression, fraud, or willful misstatement, yet still confirmed demand and penalty on grounds broader than the notice. As the statutory ingredients for invoking Rule 13 were not established on the facts found, the interest and penalty were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and penalty under Rule 13 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 were leviable where the assessee had reversed the credit before issuance of the show cause notice and the adjudicating authority had proceeded beyond the scope of the notice.

Analysis: The credit had been reversed before the show cause notice and the amount of interest had also been paid. The authorities below did not record a finding of suppression, fraud, or willful misstatement, yet still confirmed interest and penalty. The Tribunal held that the matter had been carried beyond the allegations in the notice and that the ingredients of Rule 13 were not attracted on the facts found.

Conclusion: Interest under Section 11AB and penalty under Rule 13 were not sustainable and were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Where credit is reversed before the show cause notice and no suppression, fraud, or willful misstatement is established, interest and penalty cannot be sustained on a basis broader than the notice or the statutory ingredients invoked.

---