Capital goods and input credit eligibility upheld for computers, plotters and lubricating oil under the CENVAT rules.

Credit under Rule 57Q was held admissible for computers and plotters because they were not specifically excluded at the material time and had a functional nexus with manufacture by being used to produce computer-aided designs for machinery and parts. Input credit under Rule 57A was also held admissible for lubricating oil for the period before 1-3-1997, on the basis that it remained eligible as input credit despite later treatment as capital goods, consistent with the Larger Bench view relied on in the order. The denial of credit was therefore found unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to relief on both categories.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether credit on computers and plotters was admissible as capital goods under Rule 57Q; and (ii) whether credit on lubricating oil was admissible as input credit under Rule 57A for the period prior to 1-3-1997.

Issue (i): Whether credit on computers and plotters was admissible as capital goods under Rule 57Q.

Analysis: Computers and plotters were not specifically excluded from the scope of Rule 57Q at the material time. They were used for producing computer-aided designs required in the manufacture of machinery and machinery parts, and were therefore linked to the manufacturing process.

Conclusion: Credit on computers and plotters was admissible in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether credit on lubricating oil was admissible as input credit under Rule 57A for the period prior to 1-3-1997.

Analysis: Although lubricating oil was not available as capital goods credit, input credit remained admissible under Rule 57A for the period before 1-3-1997 when lubricating oil was specified as capital goods. The reasoning was supported by the Larger Bench view relied upon in the order.

Conclusion: Input credit on lubricating oil was admissible in favour of the assessee for the relevant period.

Final Conclusion: The denial of credit was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the claimed relief on both categories of goods.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods used in the manufacturing process are not specifically excluded under the applicable credit rules, credit is admissible if they satisfy the functional nexus required by the rules, and lubricating oil was eligible for input credit for the period before it was expressly specified as capital goods.

---