TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether exercise of the power of appointment by the assessee amounted to a transfer of property under section 2(xxiv)(c) of the Gift-tax Act and attracted gift-tax; (ii) whether the taxable transfer took place in the relevant assessment year when the power was exercised; (iii) whether the trust deed authorised a direct transfer to the appointee trusts so as to avoid levy of gift-tax; and (iv) whether gift-tax could be levied on the value of the entire corpus instead of only the assessee's interest in the property.
Issue (i): Whether exercise of the power of appointment by the assessee amounted to a transfer of property under section 2(xxiv)(c) of the Gift-tax Act and attracted gift-tax.
Analysis: The statutory definition treated as a transfer the exercise of a power of appointment to determine disposition in favour of any person other than the donee of the power. On the trust deed and the resolution conferring the power, the assessee had a general power capable of being exercised even in her own favour. The exercise of that power in favour of other trusts, which were persons other than the donee, satisfied the statutory ingredients. The later amendment and the departmental circular did not take the transaction outside the pre-amendment provision.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the taxable transfer took place in the relevant assessment year when the power was exercised.
Analysis: For a transfer falling within section 2(xxiv)(c), the relevant date is the date on which the power of appointment is exercised, not the later date on which the ultimate consequences of that exercise may operate. The assessee exercised the power during the accounting year relevant to the assessment year in question, and the transfer was complete for tax purposes on that date.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (iii): Whether the trust deed authorised a direct transfer to the appointee trusts so as to avoid levy of gift-tax.
Analysis: The trust deed gave the trustees discretion only among the named beneficiaries under the settlement. The later-created four trusts were not beneficiaries under the original deed and therefore did not fall within the class of persons to whom the corpus could be transferred under that instrument. The argument that the deed authorised a direct transfer to those trusts was untenable.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (iv): Whether gift-tax could be levied on the value of the entire corpus instead of only the assessee's interest in the property.
Analysis: The transfer brought about by the exercise of the power was of the assessee's interest in the trust property and not of the entire corpus. The taxable base, therefore, could not extend to the full corpus of the trust fund.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by upholding gift-tax liability on the exercise of the power of appointment and on the timing of the transfer, while restricting the taxable value to the assessee's interest in the property and not the entire corpus.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 2(xxiv)(c) of the Gift-tax Act, the exercise of a general power of appointment in favour of persons other than the donee is a transfer of property taxable in the year of exercise, but the levy is confined to the interest actually transferred and not the whole corpus where only such interest passes.
TaxTMI 
