TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the expression "ships" in section 33AC includes barges; and (ii) whether running and maintaining barges belonging to a third party amounts to the business of operation of ships for the purpose of deduction under section 33AC.
Issue (i): Whether the expression "ships" in section 33AC includes barges.
Analysis: The expression "ship" is not defined in the Income-tax Act, 1961. The wider meaning of the term was adopted from the inclusive definition in section 2(55) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which covers every description of vessel used in navigation. Support was also drawn from the depreciation schedule in Rule 5 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, where ocean-going ships were treated as including barges. The interpretation placed by the Revenue, based on a narrow dictionary meaning, was rejected in favour of the broader statutory and functional meaning.
Conclusion: The expression "ships" includes barges.
Issue (ii): Whether running and maintaining barges belonging to a third party amounts to the business of operation of ships for the purpose of deduction under section 33AC.
Analysis: Deduction under section 33AC depends on the assessee being a qualifying company with the main object of carrying on the business of operation of ships and earning profits derived from that business. Ownership of the ships or barges was held not to be a statutory condition. The activity of running and maintaining barges was treated as falling within the business of operation of ships, following the principle that the nomenclature of the contract does not change the real nature of the business activity. On that basis, profits from such activity were regarded as eligible for deduction under section 33AC.
Conclusion: The running and maintenance of third-party barges constitutes the business of operation of ships, and ownership of the barges is not required.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed because the assessee's barge-related activities were treated as eligible ship-operation business, making the deduction under section 33AC allowable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory context uses the expression "ships" in a functional and inclusive sense, barges may fall within it, and the business of operating, running, and maintaining such vessels can qualify for deduction even without ownership, if the other statutory conditions are satisfied.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
