Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat/Cenvat credit was admissible on imported inputs short received in the factory, and whether the demand of interest and penalty could survive once the credit was held admissible.
Analysis: The shortage related to bulk liquid cargo and was found to be negligible. The recorded short receipt was treated as arising from inherent measurement variations, with reference to the permissible error recognised under the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977. The earlier Tribunal view on the same issue had been subsequently rectified and later orders in the assessee's own case allowed credit for such shortages. The Department had also accepted a later Tribunal order on the same question for another period, so Revenue was not permitted to contend otherwise in the present appeal.
Conclusion: Credit on the short received quantity was held admissible and the demand could not be sustained. The consequential claim for interest and penalty also failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on merits because the issue stood settled in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal's earlier and accepted decisions.
Ratio Decidendi: Where shortage in bulk liquid inputs is negligible and attributable to inherent measurement variation, and the Department has accepted a consistent contrary-favourable view in the assessee's own case, Modvat/Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely because the quantity received is less than the quantity shown in the import documents.