Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 97/95 as goods re-imported after repairs abroad, and whether the goods re-imported were the same as the goods exported.
Analysis: The notification granted concessional treatment to goods re-imported into India, including goods exported for repairs abroad, subject to the conditions in the table and proviso. The factual record showed that what was exported was a grinding machine, while abroad various functional units such as a high frequency spindle, static frequency converter and air/oil lubricating unit were fitted to it. The Tribunal held that such fitment could not be treated as mere repairs of the same machine, and the re-imported item was not the same goods that had been exported.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to exemption under Sl. No. 2 of the notification, and the refund claim failed.
Final Conclusion: The refund rejection was upheld because the conditions for concessional re-import of goods after repairs abroad were not satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption for re-imported goods after repairs abroad is available only when the re-imported goods remain the same goods that were exported and the process abroad amounts to repairs, not transformation by addition of functional units.