Small-scale exemption and record-keeping lapse: penalty and redemption fine could not stand without a duty demand or proof of threshold breach.

Penalty and redemption fine were held unsustainable where the assessee operated under a small-scale exemption regime, no duty demand was raised, and the only allegation was non-maintenance of proper production records. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue did not establish that the value of unaccounted goods crossed the exemption limit, and relied on the view that maintenance of production or clearance records was not required for the exemption benefit. On that basis, confiscation-linked monetary consequences were not made out, and the penalty and redemption fine were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty and redemption fine could be sustained where the assessee was operating under a small-scale exemption regime, no duty demand had been raised, and the alleged lapse was non-maintenance of proper production records.

Analysis: The only allegation in the notice was failure to maintain proper records, attracting penal action under the Central Excise Rules. The assessee was undisputedly working under a small-scale exemption notification, and the Revenue did not establish that the value of unaccounted goods took the clearances beyond the exemption limit. In the absence of any duty demand and in light of the cited Tribunal view that maintenance of records and production/clearance records was not required for the small-scale exemption benefit, the basis for confiscation-related monetary consequences was not made out.

Conclusion: The imposition of penalty and redemption fine was not justified and was set aside in favour of the assessee.

---