Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to multi-packs of lipsticks and eyeliners when each individual pack contains less than the prescribed weight.
Analysis: The dispute concerned valuation of cosmetic multi-packs. The individual lipsticks and eyeliners were below 10 ml. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench ruling that cosmetics of less than the prescribed weight, even when sold in multi-packs, fall within the exemption under Rule 34 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged) Commodity Rules and therefore do not attract Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Conclusion: Section 4A was held not to be attracted to the goods in question, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where packaged cosmetics in multi-packs remain below the prescribed weight limit for the individual units, the valuation mechanism under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply.