Rule 16 clearance period for repaired excisable goods is not statutory; duty demand and penalty failed.

Goods received back for repair, reconditioning or remaking under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were not subject to any statutory 180-day clearance limit. The time limit appeared only in a trade notice, and in the absence of a rule-based mandate, failure to clear the goods within that period did not constitute contravention of Rule 16. As a result, the demand of duty and penalty was not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether goods received back for repair, reconditioning or remaking were required to be cleared within 180 days under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and whether failure to do so justified demand of duty and penalty.

Analysis: Rule 16 does not prescribe any period within which such goods, once brought back for the stated processes, must be cleared. The time limit relied upon was found only in Trade Notice No. 45/2001 dated 19-9-2001, and in the absence of a statutory mandate, non-clearance within the stated period did not amount to contravention of the rule.

Conclusion: The demand and penalty were not sustainable.

---