Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant, facing penalty under the Customs Act, was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal, in view of the plea that penalty proceedings are independent of assessment and that no limitation governs initiation of such proceedings.
Analysis: The appeal arose from an order imposing penalty on a customs house agent for alleged unauthorised conduct in relation to import clearance. The Tribunal accepted the view that penal proceedings are independent of assessment proceedings and that no time limit was prescribed for initiating penalty action. On the facts, the allegation of appearance without authorisation was treated as prima facie serious, but the appellant's suspension from business was taken into account while balancing the claim for interim relief.
Conclusion: Complete waiver was declined. The appellant was directed to make a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 10,000 within two months, and the balance amount was waived with recovery stayed pending further hearing.